Troubleshooting Citrix Client for Linux and Fixing Mike Support

Sometimes you find yourself in one of those situations when nobody seems to have an easy solution, so you have to find one for yourself. For instance, you may need to connect to your VDI, and start your Skype meeting only to find that your microphone is disabled (in Skype, in Control Panel > Device manager).

And the answer is
to add AllowAudioInput=True
to the section [WFClient]
of wfclient.ini file
of your Citrix client configuration

So, here is how to fix it in slightly more detail:

Test Plan structure proven by several projects

Some time ago I wrote about the importance of using standards as a time saver. Since then I had a chance to apply this approach to several projects where I participated as a test expert.

So, below you can find a structure that helps to collect in one place all info you need to know about the state of test in a project. (I usually build a test plan as a single entry point for all the questions related to test by means of Atlassian Confluence, but I guess any other knowledge sharing system will do).

Also, I can guarantee that if you are able (have enough info, that is) to fill all the sections of my version of a test plan, then you do have your test process under control. So it can function as a checklist and and answer to a question where to start.

My version of a test plan consists of eight sections with subsections. Subsections may vary for each particular project, but I recommend sticking with the top-level ones.

IMPORTANT: Don't duplicate info, don't add info just to fill in sections, it is important that test plan is not just a formal piece of paper.

Bash - Another thing for the lazy: umount by name

Hi, just another script. You won't believe how many errors you can get before this simple thing works. Sometimes I wonder if my brain does it just for kicks, to see what funny message we can get this time. Or maybe it is too lazy to bother with heuristics and just goes over all the imaginable options. Surprisingly, the second thing feels like an easier one.

Or maybe it does both: 

#!/bin/bash

if [ -z $1 ]
  then printf "\nPlease provide drive name (label)\n\n"
    exit
fi

drivelabel = $1

cat /etc/mtab | grep ${drivelabel} | cut -d " " -f1 | xargs umount

Bash - Bulk file update with find and sed

Doing bulk file update (mind escapes when using complicated patterns):

#!/bin/bash

if [ -z $1 ] || [ -z $2 ]  || [ -z $3 ] || [ -z $4 ]; then
        printf "\nPlease enter:\n
        1. file command-compatible filename pattern
        2. backup suffix for affected files
        3. pattern to replace
        4. replacement\n\n
        For instance, $0 *.txt .xml-backup blue red\n
        This should replace blue with red in all txt files\n\n"
        exit
fi


filename_pattern=$1
backup_suffix=$2
pattern_to_replace=$3
replace_with=$4

find . -type f -name ${filename_pattern} -exec sed -i${backup_suffix} "s|${pattern_to_replace}|$replace_with|g" {} \+

Bash - Cut a fragment of a log by some criteria (like timestamp)

Here is how to cut out a piece of a log between two unique strings (like timestamps):

#!/bin/bash

printf "\nResults are returned *inclusive*\n\n"

if [ -z $1 ] || [ -z $2 ] || [ -z $3 ]; then
        printf "\nPlease enter SUBSTRSTART SUBSTREND and LOGPATH\nFor instance, $0 11:59:17,206 12:02:14,606 test.log\n\n"
        exit
fi

substrstart=$1
substrend=$2
logpath=$3

sed -n "/${substrstart}/,/${substrend}/p" ${logpath} | tee log_excerpt-$(date +%F_%H-%M-%S) | cat

Bash - Getting network data for the port (localhost only)

Getting network data:

#!/bin/bash

printf "\nCurrently for localhost only\n\n"

if [ -z $1 ]; then
    printf "Please enter port and [host]\n\n"
    exit
fi

port=$1
host=localhost

printf '========= lsof -i ============\n\n'

lsof -i :${port}

printf '========= netstat -lnt | grep $port ============\n\n'

netstat -lnt | grep ${port}

printf '========= nc -z $host $port  ============\n\n'

nc -z ${host} ${port}

Bash - kill everything with a matching name

Just a small script for killing matching processes by name:

#!/bin/bash

if [ -z $1 ]
then
    printf "keyword is empty\n\n"
    exit
fi

let k=0
let min=1

# mind the double brakets in do part
for i in $(ps -e | grep "$1"); do ((k++)); done

if [ "${k}" -lt "${min}" ]
then
    printf "no such process to kill\n\n"
    exit
fi


for i in $(ps -e | grep $1 | cut -s -f1 -d\t); do kill -9 ${i}; done

Password generator with bash

Looks like the best way to handle your passwords strongly depends on which password breaking approach is the most effective at the moment, and apparently those ways are changing as quickly as technology develops. Which is why it's unlikely that there will ever be a perfect way to avoid all the risks, but we can design an optimal one.

It occurred to me that first we need to select between two strategies: storing generated password or memorizing them with mnemonics. I don't think it would be a good idea to store memorizable data cause it's too easy to break the pattern, or to try to remember a generated one. As I already can do mnemonics, so I decided to write my own password generator (I like having my own collection of tools).

Solution is based on LINK. Stuff in use: cat, tr, fold, head, /dev/urandom, echo, printf, for each and parameters testing

Configuration - setting up Docker for Ubuntu 19.04

A friend of mine installed fresh Ubuntu 19.04 for which there is no stable docker yet. So we had to do it a slightly more complicated way.  

NOTE: this configuration does not help with running docker over VPN
NOTE: Some of the commands below may require sudo
NOTE: It is assumed that you configure docker for user without sudo, cause using it with sudo does not quite make sense

Self-education - Using learning matrix to plan and assess your progress

When you are learning something new and you are doing it by yourself, you may want to avoid the usual problems associated with learning, such as losing control and being unable to assess the results. I would like you to consider using learning matrix -- something I designed for myself when I need a really quick start with a new project at work.

In my experience, this approach may be useful when you cannot study full-time and have to do it alongside other activities. Or maybe you are creating a competency matrix or need an assessment tool.

The principle behind this learning matrix is simple. You list all the major areas vertically, and you put levels of qualification horizontally, and what you get is a 2D matrix that describes the area you would like to assess or master. The cells of this matrix contain criteria a learner should meet in order to be able to say, for instance, 'I have level A in functional programming' or 'I have level B in yoga'.

A word of advice. Do not try to make it too big, make sure it is feasible to learn everything you have planned. If you are not sure about some criterion, mark that criterion appropriately, to prevent it from mixing together with the clear ones. If possible, try to make your criteria SMART (simple/specific, measurable, attainable, reasonable, time-bound).

The example below is for starting with a project, but you can apply it to an academic subject or learning a skill as well. Please note that criteria add up (which means that you cannot get level B without successfully passing level A).

Coding challenge - Repeated string

When I popped out for some food today it dawned on me that there are basically two type of tests. First try to find out if you're good at drilling and memorising, and second one is looking for an ability to create your own solution. Sadly enough, first type claims to the the second type, but never vice versa.

My version of code is below and original task can be found here: LINK

Coding challenge - Jumping on Clouds

Here is another one. Didn't use collections this time.

Original task is here: LINK

My version is below

Coding challenge - Sock Merchant

I hate test tasks so much I spend four hours out of five to think why I hate them so much. This time I came up with the following list of whys:

-- expectations are never clear and when they are clear they are clearly about knowing rules for the game, not actual solving something from the scratch, to be successful you need to be familiar with known working solutions, not work on your own;
-- ruminating about what your interviewer brain processes is very distracting, cause practice proves that they may be thinking lots of things, almost all of them not in your favor.

What would be better, array or collections? If you use array they will think you don't know collections. If you use collections they'll think you have a habit of over-complicating things. And if you use for or if  they'll think you've worked with legacy for too long and sustained irreparable brain damage.

Well, anyway, original task is here, and my version of code looks like this:

Know your round numbers or how to get 2^X with bash

Since I haven't written anything valuable for a long time and still have no ideas how to fix it, here is an example of how bash can actually help you quickly get values of two to the power of something. So, here we go

pg@dana:~$ for i in {1..100}; do calc "2^$i" | xargs echo; done
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
512
1024
2048
4096
8192
16384
32768
65536
<...>
1267650600228229401496703205376

Just in case you want to get to the bottom of it, this mini-script uses:
-- my favorite calc application (package name apcalc)
-- cycles (for ... ; do... ; done)
-- ranges ({1..100})
-- redirection with xargs ( | xargs echo)

Enjoy your Linux!

PS: 'Round numbers' in relation to 2^X is actually an inside joke from the times when I couldn't afford to rent my own flat and had to share